On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 01:37 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > /usr/bin/gcc still doesn't have PPC TLS support. Does glibc default to > using 3.4 nowadays? Smart choice I guess. > > I think that's right but I haven't looked at the packaging in about a > year now. > gcc-3.4 tst-fini1mod.c -c -std=gnu99 -O2 -O3 -Wall -Winline -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -fstrict-aliasing -g -g1 -pipe -mnew-mnemonics -fpic -I../include -I. -I/home/benh/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/powerpc-nptl/nptl -I.. -I../libio -I/home/benh/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/powerpc-np tl -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/elf -I../sysdeps/powerpc/elf -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32 -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/l inux/powerpc -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../nptl/sysdeps/pthread -I../sysdeps/pthread -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix -I../nptl/sysdeps/powerpc -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I.. /sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/powerpc -I../sysdep s/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/fpu -I../sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-32 -I../sysdeps/powerpc/soft-f p -I../sysdeps/powerpc/fpu -I../sysdeps/powerpc -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generi c/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux/3.4.4/include -isystem /home/benh/glibc-2.3.5/debian/include -D_LIBC_RE ENTRANT -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symbols.h -DPIC -DSHARED -DNOT_IN_libc=1 -DNOT_IN_libc -o /home/benh/glibc-2.3.5/build-tre e/powerpc-nptl/nptl/tst-fini1mod.os -MD -MP -MF /home/benh/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/powerpc-nptl/nptl/tst-fini1mod.os.dt -MT /home/benh/glibc-2.3. 5/build-tree/powerpc-nptl/nptl/tst-fini1mod.os ../elf/tst-execstack-mod.c: In function `tryme': ../elf/tst-execstack-mod.c:24: internal compiler error: in gen_subprogram_die, at dwarf2out.c:10913
Looks like our gcc-3.4 isn't quite there yet ... I suppose I should do a new bug report against gcc Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
