Michael Stone wrote: > Frankly, I suspect that a whole lot of people would rather have a > web interface anyway--there aren't many who think the info interface > is all that friendly...
Unfortunately then there is the problem of upstream documentation and downstream stable release programs being out of sync with each other. There would be the potential for bts reports from users saying such and such a feature is documented (in a later version) but not implemented (in the stable version). Would Debian consider creating a web location for web documentation that matches the Debian releases? That would solve the issue. (And create one of needing to keep the web docs up to date out of band from package updates.) Or alternatively create a coreutils-doc-html package so that these can be locally installed by the end user? I think that would be better if the goal is to provide html documentation. Then updates to it would occur naturally as the package was updated. Then something like the following would provide a browser location for the user. file:///usr/share/doc/coreutils/html/index.html I personally am an info user so take these suggestions as coming from someone who wouldn't be using the html docs anyway. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
