On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:47:52AM -0800, Tim Freedom wrote:
> Hi Andrew, you had sent an email to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' back on
> Dec 7, 2007 requesting comment on the inclusion of sending the
> default hostname (patch provided by the ubuntu team), has that
> come to some sort of a conclusion ?  If not, can we push for an
> opinion and/or an alternate solution...
> 
> I've recently been bitten by this seemingly simple issue and dread
> having yet another location to note the hostname instead of specifying
> 'default' (or even the suggested <hostname>).

Strangely, the upstream correspondence that came back from that bug, whilst
being Cc'ed to the BTS, didn't seem to make it in. I'll see what I can do
about injecting it in.

Basically, don't hold your breath.

I'm not over the moon about the Ubuntu patch, but I guess if push comes to
shove, we might have to look at putting that one in.

regards

Andrew

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to