Arnt Karlsen a écrit : > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:22:07 +0100, Aurelien wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:41:19PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: >>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:13:43 +0100, Aurelien wrote in message >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>>> Arnt Karlsen a écrit : >>>>> Package: lm-sensors-source >>>>> Version: 1:2.10.0-7 >>>>> Severity: normal >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ...no big deal, I have run out of disk space on my .deb conflict >>>>> box and try weed out old stuff where there is newer code, like >>>>> with gcc @ 4.3 etc. >>>> 2.4 kernels only builds with gcc-3.3, and so the modules built >>>> against it also need gcc-3.3. >>>> >>>> Closing invalid bug. >>> >>> ..thanks, excellent explanation and bug handling, a valid bug would >>> be a wishlist bug on 2.4 kernel code to make it compile on e.g. >>> gcc-4.3? >> 2.4 kernels are not supported anymore since Etch. > > ..my question was whether a valid bug would be [to possible to file as] > a wishlist bug on 2.4 kernel code to make it compile on e.g. gcc-4.3? > > ..or, does the post-Etch no-2.4 policy make wishlist bugs too, invalid?
The kernel 2.4 as well as lm-sensors-source existing only in Sarge, where gcc > 3.3 doesn't exist, that would clearly make in invalid bug. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
