severity 341273 important stop
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:16:41PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > As was explained earlier in the bugreport, this is feature rather than a > bug. So tagging accordingly. this is a technical matter and i'm pretty sick of this attitude of talking bugs away. reading the start of this bug statements show clue less bla. > Please, if you disagree then clarify (references to policy or similar) > why you believe the direct use of insmod is a bug. insmod does *not* respect /etc/modprobe.d setting (beside not taking care of the module dependencies), those settings had in the special bug report i got on irc the needed module options. also it is regular usage to blacklist special drivers to allow others it needs to be done when you build several subsys together like pata and ide or firewire juju and ieee1394 stack. good evening -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
