* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-04 13:35]: > This address looks highly suspicious as it is not aligned while the type > is a (void*). > > On ARM unaligned access are not guaranteed to work and actually > depends on the CPU. On some of them it works as on i386, while usually > you get the aligned word, but rotated depending on the mis-alignement. > > In short non-aligned accesses do not generate a SIGBUS, but rather > return "corrupted" data, so here a wrong address that could lead to a > segfault. > > If you look at the bug log, all tests with aligned address work. The > others segfault or return (nil) as on tbm's machine.
Any comments, Camm? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
