Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Erm, wrong. Please read again, it's not a MUST criteria, it's a SHOULD
I don't see the point in telling me to "read again" when a) I've already put in support for your bug report and b) I already alluded to it being a only a 'should', and thus, a normal severify bug. Could you please lose that annoying turn of phrase? -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
