On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:20:15PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hrm? I thought you said the support for doing that (except by > > specifying an invalid version) wasn't implemented? > I explained you how to associate a symbol to an alternate unsatisfiable > dependency. This is what I would do if I had public symbols that I didn't Right, that's basically just the same as specifying an invalid version. You sounded like you meant something like the explicit support that you'd mentioned having considered implementing. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
