On 04/01/2008 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Petter Reinholdtsen] > > This patch change this to be the case, and make sure the two scripts > > are started in the order cryptdisk-early, cryptdisk, and stopped in > > the opposite order even when dependency based boot sequencing is > > used. > > On second thought, and to reduce the complexity of initscripts while > making cryptsetup more self contained, I recommend using a reverse > dependency on checkfs in init.d/cryptdisk, to replace an optional > dependency in checkfs on cryptdisk. Here is the updated patch:
Hey Petter, I think that your patch is not enough. cryptdisks-early needs to be started before and stopped after lvm, evms, raid, etc. cryptdisks needs to be started after and stopped before lvm, evms, raid, etc. therefore i would suggest something like: ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: cryptdisks-early # Required-Start: checkroot # Required-Stop: umountroot # Should-Start: udev devfsd # Should-Stop: udev devfsd # X-Start-Before: raid2 mdadm lvm evms # Default-Start: S # Default-Stop: 0 6 # Short-Description: Setup early encrypted block devices. # Description: ### END INIT INFO for cryptdisks-early, and the following for cryptdisks: ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: cryptdisks # Required-Start: checkroot cryptdisk-early # Required-Stop: umountroot cryptdisk-early # Should-Start: udev devfsd raid2 mdadm lvm evms # Should-Stop: udev devfsd raid2 mdadm lvm evms # X-Start-Before: checkfs # Default-Start: S # Default-Stop: 0 6 # Short-Description: Setup remaining encrypted block devices. # Description: ### END INIT INFO the relevant change is the X-Start-Before header for cryptdisks-early. what do you think about it? greetings, jonas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
