Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:31:35PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>> > Are you sure about these two? apt has Depends on them, but they're
>> > superflous (I verified that, see #452640). I don't know about D-I.
>>
>> debian-archive-keyring is not supurflous; apt's copy of the keyring is
>> out of date (containing only the 2005 and 2006 keys, no key for stable,
>> and no key for volatile) and should be removed.
>
> Uhm I guess this should be mentioned in #452640. CCing.
>
> APT maintainers: AFAICT, there two portions of my patch that still make
> sense: moving gnupg direct dependancy (d-a-k depends on gnupg for use in
> its postinst, but apt doesn't), and fix the error message.
>
> This would allow d-a-k to stop dragging gnupg in eventually.
Please send a new and updated patch for it.
I ack to remove gnupg direct depends from apt.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
