package debian-maintainers tags 460645 + moreinfo thanks [ Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:08:09AM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
>This is the second time I apply for DM: the first time [1] I had problems with
>signatures on my GPG key. Now [2] I have a signature by a guy which has, in
>turn, his key signed by a DD. Unfortunately, this is the strongest link between
>me and Debian available at the moment.
./keycheck.sh 1392B174
Syncing Debian Keyrings with rsync from keyring.debian.org
Receiving and checking key
gpg: requesting key 1392B174 from hkp server pgp.surfnet.nl
pub 1024D/1392B174 2006-02-01
Key fingerprint = 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
uid David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!3 1392B174 2006-02-01 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!3 1392B174 2007-04-28 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!3 1392B174 2008-01-02 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uid Hanska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!3 1392B174 2007-04-28 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!3 1392B174 2008-01-02 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!3 1392B174 2006-02-01 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uid David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!3 1392B174 2006-02-01 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uid David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!3 1392B174 2008-01-02 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!3 1392B174 2007-04-28 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uid [jpeg image of size 6708]
sig!3 1392B174 2007-04-28 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub 4096g/D3C07261 2006-02-01
sig! 1392B174 2006-02-01 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11 signatures not checked due to missing keys
Let's test if its a version 4 or greater key
Key is ok
Check for key expire stuff
Key has no expiration date set, nothing to check.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:17:44PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>On 11264 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>>>I already sent an application on Dec, 9: it was "stopped" for gpg-key-signing
>>>issues. I think I've (at least, partially) solved these issues, since I got
>>>my
>>>key signed by a guy, who has in turn his key signed by a DD:
>
>No. It is "signed by a DD", not "by someone who got signed by a DD".
>
>Exact text:
>"that the applicant provides a valid gpg key, signed by a Debian
>developer (and preferably connected to the web of trust by multiple
>paths)."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
