On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 08:07:20PM +0000, Martin Guy wrote: > Sorry, it's not as simple as that; it impacts on more than one other package. > If you want to get everyone to use libdb4.6 instead of explicitly > 4.[2345] (which would be a Good Thing, assuming 4.6 is
I certainly want that. > backward-compatible with all the others), then I think you need to > file bugs against all 66 other packages that call for specific > versions (presumably because what they really meant was "at least > version 4.N") That is presumably not what they meant, but feel free to help out by adding to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=oldbdb;dist=unstable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
