[Russ Allbery] > Do you think we should drop it completely or just reduce it to info?
Reducing it to info is probably good. > I think having a description is rather nice and may help figure out > where an init script abandoned by some previous package came from > without having to do as much research. It still feels like a best > practice thing even if it isn't used by software. I agree, and this is the reason it was requested as a warning in the first place. But as it is more important to flag that provides, required-start, required-stop, default-start and stop is present than short-description, I believe it is a good idea to have two levels, and thus drop the warning for short-description. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
