Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: >> > I should also say that those should also be fixed IMO: >> > I: dpkg source: non-standard-arch-in-source-relation kfreebsd-i386 >> > [build-depends: libselinux1-dev (>= 1.28-4) [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 >> > !kfreebsd-amd64]] >> > I: dpkg source: non-standard-arch-in-source-relation kfreebsd-amd64 >> > [build-depends: libselinux1-dev (>= 1.28-4) [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 >> > !kfreebsd-amd64]] >> > >> > kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, armel are unofficial architectures which are >> > mentioned in many cases. >> >> That's the definition of non-standard architecture. Maybe the tag should >> go away completely, but assuming that one buys the reason for having the >> tag at all, it is correct in this case. > > I'd expect that those kind of checks are made to catch typo in arch names > for example. But not valid arch names which have not yet been integrated.
No, really, I promise, this check is designed to catch exactly what it's catching. :) The tag you're thinking of is invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation, which is an error and not info. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
