severity 459619 serious thanks On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:53:52PM +0100, Elmar Hoffmann wrote: > Package: openssl > Version: 0.9.8g-3 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > running openssl speed leads to a segfault, at least on powerpc. > The last line printed is "Doing cast cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: > [...]", ie. the last test before rsa.
I can reproduce your problem: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ openssl speed Doing md2 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 53618 md2's in 3.00s Doing md2 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 28433 md2's in 3.00s [...] Doing blowfish cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 2465 blowfish cbc's in 1.84s Doing cast cbc for 3s on 16 size blocks: 1234613 cast cbc's in 2.55s Doing cast cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 404089 cast cbc's in 3.00s Doing cast cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 103739 cast cbc's in 3.01s Doing cast cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 26119 cast cbc's in 3.00s Doing cast cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 3272 cast cbc's in 3.00s Segmentation fault The weird thing is that when running cast or rsa on it's own it doesn't do that. I can also perfectly run this test on an amd64 and it works perfectly. I'll try to dig deeper into this. > The following backtrace has the unprintable variable contents of m and > sigret removed: > > #0 RSA_sign (type=114, m=0x1007eed0, m_len=36, sigret=0x10080ed8, > siglen=0x7fe0e748, rsa=0x7257469f) at rsa_sign.c:79 > #1 0x10030fec in ?? () > #2 0x1000e254 in ?? () > #3 0x1000e8bc in ?? () > #4 0x0fc22b10 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #5 0x0fc22cd0 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #6 0x00000000 in ?? () Did you try installing the libssl0.9.8-dbg? It might give a better backtrace. But I guess you have and wouldn't even get the variable names and source lines without that. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
