tag 454622 pending thanks On 06/12/2007, Kobayashi Noritada wrote: > However, it seems libgv-ruby is completely broken. I tried to run a > demo script in the source package, but failed: > noritada[0:24]% ruby tclpkg/gv/demo/modgraph.rb > tclpkg/gv/demo/modgraph.rb:7:in `require': no such file to load -- gv > (LoadError) > from tclpkg/gv/demo/modgraph.rb:7
That's now fixed in git, you can load the module by issuing “require 'gv'” e.g. in irb. The manpage has been updated accordingly. It sounds reasonable to expect 2.16-3 in unstable quite soonish (a few days at most). If you adapt this script by writing “require 'gv'” instead of the full path (to the old location), you'll get: > Error: renderer for gtk is unavailable but that's something different, see #457433, which will be considered later. If you change the renderer to e.g. 'png', you'll still get nothing, because of… missing code, check the TODO in the middle of the file. On 06/12/2007, Kobayashi Noritada wrote: > Also, Ruby 1.9 will be released on this year's Christmas and Graphviz > will have to support it. (Is it necessary for me to report this issue > separately as a reminder?) On 06/12/2007, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > You can eventually retitle this bugreport, that'd be enough. I can > also be prodded on #-ruby, or #-devel. I'm also reading d-d-a, so I'd > be aware of such transition. But of course I don't mind an extra > bugreport, your call. ;-) Actually, no need at all, I'm currently discussing this on debian-ruby@, so I guess I'll be able to cope with that w/o reminder. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
pgpeua9sMMQCB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
