On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:42:27PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:11:46PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:02:24PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Shouldn't adding libpq-dev to the build-dep only require the pgsql > libraries? I haven't had too much deb building experience: that was > my intention. The various DLZ backends are statically linked into > named at build-time, so seperate packages would be required.
The backend access shared libs are linked into bind. If the backend code were statically linked, that would be sufficient reason to reject things out of hand. With the change, 9.4.2 Depends on: libbind9-30, libc6 (>= 2.7-1), libdb4.2, libdns32, libisc32, libisccc30, libisccfg30, libldap2 (>= 2.1.17-1), liblwres30, libmysqlclient15off (>= 5.0.27-1), libpq5, libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8f-1), unixodbc (>= 2.2.11-1), zlib1g which is much too heavy weight for the stock package. so the question becomes, do we want to have one bind9-dlz package that scrapes all those dependencies in, or do we want to additionally have some subset that only scrape in certain pieces? (many admins have issues with "that other SQL implementation", for example.) lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
