On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:10:49PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:35:56PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > Now that sarge is frozen (and as I have just checked, a sarge fork > > of e2fsprogs made), what do you think of looking at this old bug for > > unstable? > > > > Unless I missed something, the solution proposed by Colin's last mails was > > acceptable but impossible to apply before sarge. Can we do this now? Are > > there any caveats that need to be solved first? > > Why do you care so much? This bug is priority wishlist for a reason, > I don't think anyone considers it terribly important. Splitting out > fsck will bloat the FTP archives by an additional package, and the > only advantage is that it will save a small amount of disk space > (0.001% of the space on a 100 gig filesystem, which is pretty moderate > in these days of 250 gig disks).
Because it's more than 3 years old. I'm concerned that if we miss the time frame untill the next freeze of base system, it'll never be fixed. > I'll get around to it, eventually but it's not particularly high on my > priority list. There's no hurry. But please make sure it isn't delayed untill etch is released. Thanks! -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `' http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
