tag 451258 upstream forwarded 451258 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 thanks
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:04:41AM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:09:10PM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote: > >> The same problem occurs with footnotes in orderedlist, for a test just try > >> > >> <orderedlist> > >> <listitem><para>Third footnote from ordered list > >> <footnote><para>Third footnote.</para></footnote></para> > >> </listitem> > >> </orderedlist> > > > > Was this fixed with the fop 0.94 update? Can you still reproduce this? > > > > I upgraded to fop 1:0.94.dfsg-1 in unstable and yes, the bug is still > present. > > Some details about this bug that I found in the meantime: > > 1. It affects footnotes in all <variablelist>, <glosslist>, > <orderedlist>, <itemizedlist> DocBook elements. > > 2. If you're working with <variablelist> or <glosslist>, then there is > one workaround: you can set variablelist.as.blocks and > glosslist.as.blocks XSL parameters (like > > <xsl:param name="variablelist.as.blocks">1</xsl:param> > <xsl:param name="glosslist.as.blocks">1</xsl:param> > > ). This way <variablelist> and <glosslist> are not formatted as real > lists in XML-FO files, and footnotes from there work OK. But this also > changes the look of these elements in PDF output, so it may not be > desirable. > > Unfortunately, this doesn't help at all if you want to make footnotes > >from <orderedlist> or <itemizedlist>. > > 3. It turns out this is a known problem with FOP, see > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/knownissues.html (search for text > "Footnotes swallowed in lists") and > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 > > I hope this info helps others that are affected by this bug... Thanks for that information. I will tag the bug accordingly. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
