On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:37:14PM +0100, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 11:46 -0400, sean finney wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:29:14PM +0100, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote: > > > Personally I think it'd be better if the nagios rules were all provided > > > by logcheck. What do you think? > > > > since there's nagios stuff already there, that makes sense to me. > > I've had a look at the source package (version: 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-2) > and I can't find the logcheck rules provided by nagios anywhere.. If > there are any rules which were in nagios but aren't in logcheck, it'd be > nice to have them included.
that's because there aren't any :) the bug was to add something
to the nagios logcheck rules, which i'm assuming are in logcheck
because they're not provided by nagios.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
