[Bastian Blank] > Why lvm here, not lvm2? After discovering that insserv refuses to install scripts providing the same service as a nother script (see bugs #458346 and #458486), I've concluded that it is not a good idea to let lvm10 and lvm2 provide the same service, and thus I believe it is better to let init.d/lvm2 provide lvm2, and update all scripts that depend on lvm to also depend on lvm2 (or better, let lvm2 reverse depend on the scripts it should start before and stop after).
Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
