Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Personally, I'd like to know what is the increase on space and memory
> for adding bzcat on busybox-udeb. However, as said in another mail, I
> see no point to support different set of features on installed and d-i
> environments (from debootstrap POV).
I've compiled busybox with bunzip2 enabled to check how much it would
increase the size of the binary.
#v+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l busybox-with-bunzip2/bin/busybox
-rwxr-xr-x 1 otavio otavio 263696 2008-01-02 13:01
busybox-with-bunzip2/bin/busybox
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l busybox-without-bunzip2/bin/busybox
-rwxr-xr-x 1 otavio otavio 259856 2007-07-03 12:50
busybox-without-bunzip2/bin/busybox
#v-
So it increases 3840 bytes. To me, it looks worth the space change and
I think we could accept this. What others think?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
