[Petter Reinholdtsen] > When testing dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered a minor > bug in the init.d/hwclockfirst.sh script. It claim to provide > hwclock, which is also provided by the hwclock.sh script. This lead > to a slightly wrong dependency graph.
This change was not enough. Both scripts can not depend on $local_fs (which in this case is mountall.sh), as that leads to a dependency loop (hwclockfirst->$local_fs->mountall->checkfs->checkroot->hwclockfirst). Based on its current boot sequence, I suspect hwclockfirst should depend on mountkernfs and udev, and nothing more. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
