On Nov 18, 2007 2:24 PM, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andres Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-18 16:23:19 CET]: > > I now see the problem is that cegui >= 0.5.0 is needed. Since kfreebsd > > doesn't have cegui >= 0.5.0 available yet, the check for it goes to > > false. I need to fix one of the patches to catch this and I'll need to > > seperate the cegui-ogre libraries onto a different package. > > Can you *pretty* please, with sugar on top, add some more informations > to your BTS mails? It's nasty to require to go to the BTS to see what > the mail is about. Having the package name or anything else quoted, or > even a meaningful subject shouldn't be too problematic, is it? > > Can we please try to have some reasonable parts in the mails we send to > the BTS, for both users who are receiving the mails, but also for > ourself as a team to not have to figure out what someone is talking yet > again? > > So long, > Rhonda >
OK, well there's an autotool check for the existence of cegui >= 0.5.0. If true, then HAVE_CEGUI is defined. An automake file (Samples/Common/Makefile.am) then checks for HAVE_CEGUI and if defined includes CEGUIRenderer in SUBDIRS. I initially patched this file to only define SUBDIRS with CEGUIRenderer, leaving out other subdirectories. This was assuming all kernels/architectures that ogre was built on had cegui >= 0.5.0. When ogre was built on these kernels/architectures without cegui >= 0.5.0, the build would fail at this point, since the subdirectory Samples/Common/CEGUIRenderer was included in the directories to enter during build, but a Makefile would not be found since none would be generated. -- Regards, Andres Mejia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
