This one time, at band camp, Philippe Cloutier said: > Le December 23, 2007 05:14:20 pm Stephen Gran, vous avez écrit : > > This one time, at band camp, Philippe Cloutier said: > > > Now that clamav 0.9x is in testing, should this bug's severity be > > > upgraded to grave, serious or important? I tried using klamav and it > > > doesn't seem to work, but I have no experience with it. > > > > klamv is broken by design. klamav doesn't use published interfaces, or > > the actual programs. Since it wants to use it's own internal > > representation of the state of the programs, it needs to advance in > > lockstep with the clamav upstream. If it's maintainer isn't willing to > > do that, it should probably be removed from the archive. We don't need > > more software that is broken by design. If upstream klamav wants to > > change to use a published clamav interface rather than muck around in > > the internals, it will probably go easier for them, but failing that, > > it's up to the Debian maintainer if he wants to keep it in the archive. > > Heh. I see the relation between the bug and what you wrote, but this is my > first time using ClamAV so I can't discuss meta bugs yet. All I can discuss > is this specific bug. Feel free to open a new report about the design. My > question is whether this particular incompatibility makes KlamAV unusable or > is still just a normal bug.
OK, I'm not bothered either way about it. If you don't think you're interested in thinking about the bug report for some reason, that's OK with me. I'm just a little confused about why you're inquiring about the appropriate severity of a bug that you don't then want to take any further interest in. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
