On Monday 02 May 2005 04:53, Chad Martin wrote: > Just setting the version to 2.4 or 2.6 does not match the available > kernel-image names. Those names look like 2.6.8-2-686 or > 2.6.8-10-em64t. The "." in the "cut" command needs to be a "-".
No, what we want to install is one of the following packages. These packages help kernel upgrades: the actual kernel-images are pulled in by dependencies from these. Automatic selection of the em64t kernels are currently not supported by the installation system. kernel-image-2.4 kernel-image-2.4-386 kernel-image-2.4-586tsc kernel-image-2.4-686 kernel-image-2.4-686-smp kernel-image-2.4-k6 kernel-image-2.4-k7 kernel-image-2.4-k7-smp kernel-image-2.6 kernel-image-2.6-386 kernel-image-2.6-686 kernel-image-2.6-686-smp kernel-image-2.6-k7 kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp I would expect the kernel-image-2.[46]-686-smp images to be the correct ones for dual Xeon. If you want to be able to select a different kernel-image, you should install at medium or low (expert) priority. We really need the output of 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' from the original submitter of the report (or someone having the same setup) to check if our kernel selecting rules need changing. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
