tags 457121 +wontfix stop On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:45:40PM -0500, John Belmonte wrote: > > It would be a clear violation of the semantics as stated in the > > reference manual. > > I'm not suggesting we depart from upstream. This is an upstream > misdesign which they need to correct. If function/chunk arguments are > a constrained resource (like CPU registers, stack size, etc.) then the > lua interpreter has no business mapping command line arguments to > them. What if some OS had virtually unlimited command line length?
OK, we all agree on this, thus this ``bug'' will not be fixed with a Debian specific patch. Hoping for an upstream release that fixes that misdesign choice, I tag the bug with wontfix. cheers -- Enrico Tassi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
