also sprach Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.12.14.2049 +0100]: > Did you add the "dynamic" keyword to the server line? Do you see > that ntpd sees the new device comming up in the logs?
No, and I don't understand why I should have dynamic there. The problem is not that the server isn't reachable when ntpd starts, but that at some point, the route to the server changes. No, ntpd does not report the new (tun) device coming up, it seems. Then again, it's also not acting as a server here (port 123 is closed). I use ntpd only to keep the local machine in sync with another NTP server. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems the remote desktop feature of windows xp is really nice (and *novel*!). a micro$oft consultant can *remotely* disable the personal firewall and control the system. we'll ignore the fact that this tampering with the firewall is not logged, and more importantly, that the firewall isn't restored when the clowns from redmond are done with their job.
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
