All'incirca Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:27:09 +0100,  Romain Beauxis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sembrerebbe aver scritto:

> Le Thursday 20 December 2007 16:17:03 Giovanni Mascellani, vous avez
> écrit :
> > This can be avoided, for example, by passing the --oknodo to
> > start-stop-daemon, or by managing correctly its failures.
> 
> Sorry I wasn't clear.
> 
> This I understand, but it's the desired behaviour: the package should
> not be removed if the daemon didn't exit well, in particular if it's
> still running...

Well, --oknodo doesn't mask the failure, it only masks the
"nothing-to-do" case. If the daemon didn't exit well, start-stop-daemon
would anyhow exit with an error status code.

> So my question was about the reason why _your_ daemon failed to stop..
> If this is caused by some wrong configuration/anything from your
> side, then it's not a bug from the package I guess...

My daemon was simply stopped, just because I didn't use
peercast-servent. And I think that this shouldn't prevent peercast to
be removed. :-)

Regards, Giovanni.
-- 
Giovanni Mascellani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pisa, Italy

Web: http://giomasce.altervista.org
SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 0x5F1FBF70 (FP: 1EB6 3D43 E201 4DDF 67BD  003F FCB0 BB5C 5F1F BF70)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to