On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:40:22AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > It makes sense, at least as long as we have no way to differentiate the > generic build requirement from the build requirement on official Debian > buildd.
Thanks. I shall do so, for those packages which I am concerned about. > It's still an issue that we need to tackle once but it's so low priority > that I never managed to go forward with a proposition. Well, as long as things are clear, it's fine. We should just ensure that maintainers who depended on the old behaviour (like me) take evasive action to prevent an unneeded dependency. Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
