Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 schrieb Luk Claes: >>> xmms exists, it is up to date, there are no RC bugs, and there is no >>> removal bug filed. As far as I can see, this is all fantasy. What is >>> going on here? >> A removal bug is only acted upon when it's ready, so the bug is not >> filed yet. So we are in the preparing stage... > > Well, until there is any kind of documentation why xmms should be removed, I > am not going to do anything about this bug. I am certainly not going to > assist you in removing software that I happily use.
Oh xmms should be removed because it's obsoleted by at least bmpx, audacious and xmms2 while it's unmaintained upstream. So it might be wise to explore the possibilities of using one of the alternatives... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
