On Tue, 2007-18-12 at 00:13 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > I took this upstream, and while they agreed that the problem was real, they > were a bit reluctant to accept the patch, since any such solution potentially > must be kept around for a long time even if a proper fix is found. I'm a bit > unsure where to go next -- I'm not very keen on keeping a patch in Debian > that upstream doesn't want...
That is unfortunate. I agree though, there isn't much point diverging. Interestingly though, rpc.statd has a --name option for the same purpose. :) As I will be needing the option, I will still maintain the patch as it is. -- Andrew Phillips Atlantic Division, IT Operations & Client Support Directorate CIO Branch Environment Canada (902) 426-6262 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
