Michael Kerrisk, le Mon 17 Dec 2007 16:15:47 +0100, a écrit : > On 12/17/07, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Michael Kerrisk, le Mon 17 Dec 2007 15:56:00 +0100, a écrit : > > > @@ -56,10 +71,6 @@ > > > done > > > chown root:tty /dev/vcs* > > > .fi > > > - > > > -No > > > -.BR ioctl (2) > > > -requests are supported. > > > .SH FILES > > > /dev/vcs[0\-63] > > > .br > > > > Mmm, I think this is still true. There is no ioctl defined in > > drivers/char/vc_screen. c . But if you dropped it just because it's not > > very useful to mention it, then fine. > > Hmmm -- have I made a mistake then. I dropped that sentence because I > mistakenly thought that the addition of VT_GETHIFONTMASK made the > sentnce no longer true. But of course it is still true because that > ioctl() does not apply to /dev/vcs[a]*, right?
Yes. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
