Package: lvm2 Version: 2.02.26-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch fabbione asserts that gulm locking is obsolete and thus these build-dependencies are not required, we carry a diff from Debian to remove them and our package appears to build just fine without them.
Please consider removing them as well, or explain why we shouldn't remove them. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers gutsy-updates APT policy: (500, 'gutsy-updates'), (500, 'gutsy-security'), (500, 'gutsy') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-14-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -u lvm2-2.02.26/debian/control lvm2-2.02.26/debian/control --- lvm2-2.02.26/debian/control +++ lvm2-2.02.26/debian/control @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian LVM Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.2), libdevmapper-dev (>> 2:1.02.20), autotools-dev, libccs-dev, libcman-dev, libdlm-dev (>> 1.02.00), libgulm-dev, libselinux1-dev, libreadline5-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.2), libdevmapper-dev (>> 2:1.02.20), autotools-dev, libcman-dev, libdlm-dev (>> 1.02.00), libselinux1-dev, libreadline5-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: lvm2
