Hi, On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 15:46:01 +0200, Jussi Hakala wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.13.25
> Etch's dpkg does not recognize arm-none-linux-uclibcgnueabi as a valid > architecture. Just to clarify, the version in etch is not going to be updated for this anyway, that's Debian release policy. > Don't know if this architecture string is exactly a proper > one to begin with, but at compile time it seemed like the most reasonable > one from all the options... It seems like a valid GNU triplet. Although for dpkg purposes the -none- is unneeded. > Anyway, we need a separate architecture for armel+uclibc. Given other conversations, I take this is for Maemo. And my same concerns apply, why do you need a new architecture? And do you realize this would imply having two different dpkg db (there's no multiarch support yet anyway)? > Meanwhile, made this horrid patch to get the architecture recognized as > armel, as with the ordinary arm+glibc equivalent. This is the completely wrong approach, I'd recommend you don't do that in Maemo either. thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
