On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:50:23PM +0100, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:14 -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-16 19:56]: > > > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/09/10/gcc43/libsigc++-2.0_2.0.17-2build1_gutsylp.buildlog > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/Re:-libsigc++-and-g++-4.3-p11507869.html > > > > Is there any update on this, Daniel and Murray? I'm trying to build > > the Debian archive with 4.3 to report bugs and quite a few packages > > fail because of sigc++-2.0. Getting sigc++-2.0 fixed would make it > > much easier for me to see which packages have 4.3 related build > > issues. > > > > BTW, Fedora and OpenSUSE are quickly moving to gcc 4.3 so this needs > > to be fixed anyway. > > I guess I should install a relevant distro in a vm. What's a quick way > to get the right version of debian?
Install etch, upgrade to lenny, add http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ experimental main to /etc/apt/sources.list, and then run "aptitude install g++-4.3". > The actual error looks a bit scary. It seems to be complaining about a > fundamental libsigc++ technique. It looks like sigc++ is trying to create a typedef in a subclass that shadows the corresponding typedef in a base class. Is my reading correct? (that makes a lot more sense than what I thought it was doing last night :) ) Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
