Le Saturday 08 December 2007 07:07:19 Sjoerd Simons, vous avez écrit : > reassign 452909 pm-utils > thanks > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:25:14PM +0100, GALLIEN Matthieu wrote: > > Le lundi 26 novembre 2007, Sjoerd Simons a écrit : > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:49:49AM +0100, Matthieu Gallien wrote: > > > > Package: hal > > > > Version: 0.5.10-2 > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > > > Due to the last upload of hal, there is regression in the support of > > > > pmu. None of them seems complicated to fix as I was able to find > > > > workarounds without prior knowledge of hal and dbus stuff.. > > > > > > > > The symptom was that I was no longer able to suspend to ram using > > > > kpowersave. I used qdbusviewer to interacts with hald and also > > > > executed hals in a console. I found that > > > > /usr/lib/hal/hal-system-power-pm-is-supported reports to hal that my > > > > computer cannot suspend to ram. This is wrong. Since the regression, > > > > I was able to suspend my computer using: > > > > /usr/lib/hal/hal-system-power-pmu sleep > > > > > > Hmm, do we still ship hal-system-power-pmu, we shouldn't. But that's > > > another bug :) > > > > Yes you still ship hal-system-power-pmu and I use it currently. > > Don't assume it will still be availble on the next upload :)
Ok I understand. > > > > > I believe that /usr/lib/hal/hal-system-power-pm-is-supported should > > > > be fixed to at least say yes when an hal helper is able to do the > > > > job. Second problem, > > > > /usr/lib/hal/scripts/linux/hal-system-power-suspend-linux is not able > > > > to suspend to ram my computer. There the problem is that hal > > > > apparently only supports pm-utils. Again, adding those some lines > > > > solved the problem: > > > > > > What needs to be fixed is pm-utils to properly support suspend on PMU > > > machines. As soon as this is fixed, hal will automagically start > > > working again. > > > > Yeah why not. > > It is not my package and I have no right to say what is the best. > > I know that currently hal no longer support pmu and I found a workaround > > before pm-utils is fixed. This is why I submitted this bug report. There > > is people who have lost functionnality. > > > > > I'd rather spend my time fixing pm-utils then adding workarounds in hal > > > to hid problems :) I just haven't come around to actually fixing > > > pm-utils yet. > > > > Do I need to submit a bug report ? > > Nope, i'm reassigning this bug to pm-utils. I build and upload uswsusp on > powerpc, so now all that's left is for pm-utils to correctly show suspend > is supported on PMU machines.. Which can be as simple as checking if > /dev/pmu exists. If you need some help to test packages, I can do it. Unfortunateky I have no time to help you more than to do testing. Thanks in advance for your work. > > Sjoerd Best regards -- Gallien Matthieu
