Hi, On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 06:44:45PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 09:24:35AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Yep. that's why I modified the patch. See > git://git.debian.org/~lamont/postfix.git
Somehow, I can not read this ... I see it under public_git in your home. (I did not really check what was wrong... probably my command line.) > > Solution1: (Pedantic) > And that's what it does. Good. > > Solution2: (I like this better for simplicity) > See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/135851 Yes, but this could have been dismissed if README.Debian mention that you need to install postfix-doc to get full documentation at the top of README.Debian. I just hate too see overengineering for doc package. If postfix-doc is recommended by postfix, apt-get(new) or aptitude will install postfix-doc as default. Anyway, this is your call so I am not pushing this too much... > > Comment: > > I do not understand why following still exist for postfix. > > Replaces: ... postfix-doc (<< 1.1.7-0) > > Since postfix has postfix-doc package as I observe, why not just set > > Conflicts: ... postfix-doc (<< 1.1.7-0) > > if the old postfix-doc (<< 1.1.7-0) causes problem? > > It's there to allow partial upgrades. OTOH, 1.1.7 is about 3 major > Debian releases ago, so it can certainly go at this point. I see. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
