hi, On Mi, 2007-12-05 at 16:09 +0100, Mario Izquierdo (mariodebian) wrote: > Package: ltspfsd > Version: 0.5+debian1 > Severity: normal > > lstpfsd is used only in LTSP chroot and Recomends ldm package. > > I'm working on new thin client implementation and try to put into Debian > officially. I don't need ldm login manager, only ltspfsd daemon. > > Since some time, apt recommended packages are installed and > without extra configuration can install ltspfsd without ldm. well, i think ltspfsd will not work without the proper mcookie thats set by ldm anymore you will need any similar implementation in whatever you use instead, between the 4 and 5 series a lot of security changes were made that you will need to take into account, ldm brings parts of these in. i dont see a reason why we shouldnt split the binary into ltspfsd-core and ltspfsd-scripts and an ltspfsd metapackage that depends on both.
that way you could use the ltspfsd-core package which contains only the
binary. it has the advantage that the scripts can be arch: all
any opinions ?
ciao
oli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
