On Wednesday 05 December 2007 09:54:30 Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:38:57PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: > > tags 449307 patch > > thanks > > Hi Kel > > > I couldn't reproduce the reporters problems, but I do kinda think it > > makes since to use cpufreq-info to count cpu cores rather than /proc/*. > > At least the maintainer is in charge of the output format in this case, > > and not at the hands of the variable kernel of the day.... > > and guess how cpufreq-info reads the number of cores? :)
From /proc/stat. > Seriously, the output of /proc/cpuinfo is not going to change without a > proper announce months before while I don't think the ouput of > cpufreq-info has to be that reliable. > > I'm not really keen to apply this patch... Just trying to help. Thanks for comment. Thanks, Kel.
