"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >>> It would be nice if Lintian could be made aware that the "gf" suffix is >>> being used in the names of runtime library packages that have been >>> rebuilt with gfortran instead of g77 (refer to: >>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-toolchain/2007/07/msg00000.html ) >> >> Is there something in the binary that can be used to determine if it's >> build with gfortran? > > One or more of these maybe? > > ldd $binary | grep -q libgfortran.so > objdump -x $binary | grep NEEDED | grep -q libgfortran.so > nm -D $binary | grep -q _gfortran
We've ignored similar transition suffixes in the past for this check without verifying that they were used by a package that had the particular transition problem. I don't think it's likely that someone making naming mistakes in shared library packages would make the mistake of accidentally using a transition suffix they don't need, so I think we can not worry too much about this. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
