unmerge 155835 453408 thanks Yasushi SHOJI a écrit : > First of all, thank you for aknowledge my bug report. > > I've checked b.d.o and noticed that the bug report is merged to > bug #155835. so I've read the log and it seems that bug #155835 is > about c99 and gnu extension conflict. > > as I said in the previous message, I just want to use gnu extension > version of %as, not c99. and it works if the given buffer is not > empty. but dies with empty string, like '""'. > > so I thought that it is a bug in the gnu extension side. > > I know you guys understand glibc much better than I do. so this not > questioning what you guys are doing, but rather I'd like to have some > explanation why #453408 and #155835 are merged, if possible. so if > someone like me checked the log will understand why. >
Sorry I have read too quickly, I thought you were trying to use the c99 version which is actually behaving the same way as the gnu extension. This is a different and real bug. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
