On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Robert Millan wrote: > Please could you move dpkg-architecture from dpkg-dev to dpkg ? It seems that > because of this, it turns out that having the xorg meta-package installed > requires dpkg-dev and hence binutils (because of type-handling).
dpkg-architecture is perl and the goal is rather to get rid of perl in dpkg than the contrary. So my first vote is against this change. Why does xorg need dpkg-architecture ? Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
