[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) writes:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:12:25AM +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
>> I found the problem: during the build the system does a self-test that uses
>> /dev/log, this fails with a connection refused:
>>
>> Test SB-BSD-SOCKETS-TEST::SIMPLE-LOCAL-CLIENT failed
>> Form: (PROGN
>> (WHEN
>> (AND (PROBE-FILE "/dev/log")
>> (SB-POSIX:S-ISSOCK
>> (SB-POSIX:STAT-MODE (SB-POSIX:STAT "/dev/log"))))
>> ...
>> (FORMAT STREAM
>> "<7>bsd-sockets: Don't panic. We're testing
>> local-domain client code; this message can safely be ignored"))))
>> T)
>> Expected value: T
>> Actual value: #<SB-BSD-SOCKETS:CONNECTION-REFUSED-ERROR {10011C4841}>.
>>
>> I have no idea how to write a build-depends on a /dev/log file. Nor for
>> that matter on a working TCP/UDP echo service needed for another test.
>
> Maybe packages shouldn't assume they can do such tests and just don't
> bother. Why would the buildd admin want to allow the buildd to put crap
> in their log files of the system? Seems like a bad idea to me.
>
> Do these tests actually pass when run on other architectures' buildds?
>
> Len Sorensen
Maybe sbuild could create the /dev/log socket in the chroot and add
messages to the buildd log.
MfG
Goswin
PS: Nothing in policy defines what is available in /dev for builds
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
