Hi, The watch file sent to this report does work, and since you are using the same version numbering as upstream I don't see any reason why you are removing the watch file on the next upload.
> Upstream doesn't have a version number in the tarballs name Your package's upstream download directory looks like: nss_updatedb-4.tar.gz 15-Mar-2006 11:06 63K nss_updatedb-4.tar.gz 15-Mar-2006 11:06 63K nss_updatedb-5.tar.gz 05-May-2006 16:18 63K nss_updatedb-6.tar.gz 17-May-2006 16:44 63K nss_updatedb-7.tar.gz 13-Nov-2006 22:37 63K nss_updatedb-8.tar.gz 27-Oct-2007 10:43 95K Which work just fine with uscan and the watch file I submitted on my previous message. So I'm asking you to reconsider your decision and include the working watch file on your next upload rather than removing it. Sincerely, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
