Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about considering missing watch files an I-level instead of a > warning? I don't expect people complaining about an informative message > :)
That's mostly because few people look at the informative messages, which is a problem that I'd like to fix by making them more reliable and useful. I wish I had time to work on a better fine-grained lintian message classification system. I'll think about it. We seem to be gathering more momentum around the idea that watch files should be expected and almost always used. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
