Hi, LT-P wrote: > > I don't believe that makes sense (and I do believe OOo upstream - > > which would need to implement this - believe the same. > I think it does; that's why I am adding it to the wishlist. But the rest > is for the community to decide.
Can you then please file a bug upstream (as I won't argument for it and it was your suggestion) so it gets filed where it belongs? (And probably will never implemented, given that more imprtant stuff than this is being lost in the black hole "requirements" - where ENHANCEMENTS like this go...). And please tell me the issue nr then so I can mark this as forwarded... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
