On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:00:50AM +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > > Could you please tell me what the case would be for which it would > > fire? I am interested in fixing it. > > I don't know how this watch thing works but a r.e.: > > http://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-([\d\.]+)\.tar\.gz > > would also match gnupg-2.0.0.tar.gz .
This I accept. > Ah, I see: we don't distribute .gz tarballs for gnupg-2 anymore and thus > your test did not fail. But it may happen that we accidently or on > demand upload a .gz tarball and then your r.e. won't work anymore. Use > > http://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-1\.([\d\.]+)\.tar\.gz > > or better > > http://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-1\.([\d\.]+)\.tar\.bz2 > > as we are distributing bzip2 tarballs for a long time now. Well, I think this is enough input for the maintainer to add a watch file. Thanks for the inputs, Werner. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai - 600036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
