Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steve, do you need more time to comment about the proposed changes?
> I'm OK to make the delay longer if you need it. Hi Christian, I've now reviewed the patch and it seems reasonable to me. I see that you already removed the LDBM description from the template, which is excellent. In the current version of the package, I've dropped all of: slapd/autoconf_modules slapd/fix_directory slapd/slave_databases_require_updateref slapd/migrate_ldbm_to_bdb so these can also be dropped from the templates that you're translating and from any translations. The only additional change that I think we should now make is in the description of the backend choices. HDB is now fairly stable and we probably shouldn't be discouraging it, but it's not necessary unless the user wants to support subtree renames. So something like: The BDB backend is recommended. When using it, the database must be configured accordingly. Please check /usr/share/doc/slapd/README.DB_CONFIG.gz for more details. . HDB uses a similar storage format to BDB but adds support for subtree renames. It is otherwise identical to BDB and supports the same configuration options. I'm sorry that no one got back to you much sooner. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
