On Nov 10, Michael Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the maintainer does not believe this to be an issue [1] because the > firmware fetching stuff is a small part of the total package. i The maintainer is correct.
> suggested that he could split out the firmware fetching stuff into a > contrib package instead, but he didn't seem to think that was a good > idea. and even so, that still doesn't solve the second problem. the > correct solution would be to put the firmwares into a non-free > package. This may or may not be useful, but it would still not make foo2zjs depend on that firmware as I explained in my other message. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
